Watch

Let me tell you what this course was, and what it wasn't.

It's grounded in a specific piece of research: my interpretative phenomenological analysis study of fifteen adult adoptees in same-race domestic adoptions in the United States. The Adoptee Lifespan Framework comes out of that study. That's a real base, and it's a narrow one: fifteen people, one kind of adoption, one country.

And the course went well past that base on purpose. Chapter 6 covered populations the study didn't include: transracial adoptees, intercountry adoptees, kinship and other family configurations, late discovery, NPE, donor-conceived adults. What you got there was orientation, and orientation isn't the same as knowing.

The framework also sits alongside others rather than replacing them. Brodzinsky's stress-and-coping model, Grotevant's work on communicative openness, Pavao's normative crises. It's worth reading across them, since this is one contribution among several.

And this isn't a credential, and it certifies nothing. Programs like the Center for Adoption Support and Education's Training for Adoption Competency involve far more hours, supervised practice, and assessment than anything here. If you want the credential, go and get it.

I asked an adoptee what she'd want from a therapist who had just finished a course like this one. Listen for what she's actually asking for, because it probably isn't expertise.

The thing I most want to leave you with is a critique of the word we've been using this whole time. Encompass Adoptees, an adoptee-led practice, talks about continual learning rather than competency, and they name the problem exactly: the idea that a single class can offer competency, or that a therapist can come to the end of learning all that is necessary, and they're right: the word suggests a finish line that doesn't exist here. A counselor who did adoption-competency training in 2015 and stopped learning isn't adoption-competent now, whatever the certificate says.

So the failure mode I'd most like to prevent is you walking out of here having concluded that you know how to work with adoptees. What I'd rather you leave with is an orientation, and the knowledge that your clients will keep teaching you, that adoptee scholars keep publishing work that won't reach you through clinical training, and that recognizing your limits is ordinary practice rather than a confession.

And notice what this course actually asked of you. Some of it was skills: the questions, the repair, the differential thinking, the somatic attention. A lot of it was personal. Every Reflect asked you to find your own version of something, your own alarm, your own loss that nobody marked, your own urge to fix. That wasn't decoration around the clinical content. You can't do this work well on technique alone, because most of what gets in the way is yours: the gratitude reflex, the pull toward reunion, the discomfort of sitting in grief that isn't going to resolve. A course doesn't fix those. You notice them, over and over, for as long as you do this work.

That's why the work doesn't close. Staying in it, noticing yourself, reading, consulting, letting your clients teach you, is what competence here actually looks like. Thank you for doing the work, and go be the person they don't have to explain themselves to.

Reflect

Think back across this whole course to the moment you recognized yourself. Maybe it was the pull to reassure. Maybe the reunion suggestion. Maybe the sentence about the parents who loved them, that you know you have said.

Write one sentence: what's the thing in you most likely to get in the way of an adopted client, and what will you do when you notice it? Write it as something you could actually catch in the moment, rather than something you intend to fix.

That sentence is your practice plan. It's worth more than anything else you'd write down today.

Keep — one-page takeaway

What this course is, and is not

• Grounded in an IPA study of fifteen adult adoptees in same-race domestic US adoptions. The Adoptee Lifespan Framework is built from it. A real base, and a narrow one.
• It reaches past that base, especially in Chapter 6. Those populations weren't in the study, and the orientation there is partial.
• One framework among several. Read across Brodzinsky (stress and coping), Grotevant (communicative openness), Pavao (normative crises).
• Not a credential, and it shouldn't be presented as one. Formal programs (C.A.S.E.'s TAC, the Hogue Center, others) involve substantially more hours, supervised practice, and assessment.
• The competency framing itself is contested. Encompass Adoptees argues for continual learning instead, and the critique is substantive: the word implies a completion this work doesn't have.

Supervision and consultation

• Adoption-competent supervision is scarce; the training gap this course addresses operates at the supervisor level too. You may not find one locally.
• C.A.S.E. runs TAC and maintains a directory of clinicians who completed it; some offer consultation to other practitioners.
• Adoptee-clinician directories (e.g. Beyond Words Psychological Services) list clinicians who identify as adoptees and may consult.
• Adoption-specialty practices offer consultation to outside clinicians, including Pavao's Center for Family Connections.
• One-off consultation is appropriate and often most practical: a first transracial adoptee client, a placement-era discovery, a late discovery, a complex reunion.
• Peer learning is often more available and more sustainable than formal supervision: case consultation groups, peer relationships, listservs, adoption-focused CE.

Adoptee community, with boundaries

• Adoptee communities are communities for adoptees, not clinical training spaces. Clinicians who are adoptees may participate as members.
• Non-adoptee clinicians stay connected to adoptee voice by reading adoptee-led publications, listening to adoptee podcasts, and following adoptee scholarship, rather than by joining those spaces.

Where to keep learning

• Scholars publishing now: Susan Branco, Amanda Baden, JaeRan Kim, Kimberly McKee, Angela Tucker, Phebe Brako, and others addressed across the modules.
• Books: Tucker, "You Should Be Grateful"; McKee, "Disrupting Kinship"; Pavao, "The Family of Adoption"; the "Adoption Therapy" anthology edited by Laura Dennis as a single starting reference.
• Adoptee-led publications: Severance Magazine (adoptee, NPE, and donor-conceived voices), Lavender Reads, the Lost Daughters blog, Bastard Nation on records reform.
• Podcasts: The Adopted, Adoptees On, and Family Secrets for NPE and late discovery material.
• Organizations: American Adoption Congress, NACAC, C.A.S.E., the Donaldson Adoption Institute, and state-level groups. They vary in orientation, from practice to policy to reform.

Your practice plan

• Name the reflex most likely to get in your way (gratitude, reunion, time-as-healer, the pull to fix). You have at least one.
• Write what you'll do when you notice it in session, in words you'd actually use.
• Pick one adoptee-authored source to read next, and one person you could call for consultation.

Continued considerations

• What will tell you, two years from now, that you've stopped learning this?
• Who supervises your adoption work, and if the answer is nobody, what's your plan?
• Sit with this: the skills were half of it. What are you going to do about the other half, which is you?

↓ Download this takeaway (PDF)