Watch

Now that you know all this, you have a new problem.

The common failure in adoption work is the one this whole course has been about: a therapist who never engages the adoption at all. One of the adoptees in the research described a therapist she called phenomenal, who wasn't adoption-informed, and she said she never brought the adoption material to her because she didn't think the woman could field it. That's the usual story, and it's most of why this course exists.

There's a second failure though, and it tends to show up in people who just took a course like this one. The framework is fresh, it explains things you've seen for years and never had words for, and suddenly every adopted client's material starts looking like adoption material, the depression, the marriage, the job all read through the one lens. Both failures are the same mistake underneath, which is reading your own frame instead of the client.

I asked an adoptee about therapists who got this wrong in each direction. Listen for what she actually needed.

So the question isn't whether adoption is significant, because you already know it is. The question is what's operating for this person right now, and the honest answer is often more than one thing at once.

Some patterns are worth knowing. A client who apologizes through every session and thanks you at the end as though you granted him something. A client whose whole life is being useful, who gets anxious when the doing slows. A client who has left every relationship before she could be left and calls it needing space. A client waiting for the shoe to drop in every close relationship. A client who has felt outside for as long as they can remember. A client for whom holidays hurt and she has stopped trying to work out why. Adoption may well be operating in all of those. You don't hand them the connection, though. You keep working on what they came in for, and you stay awake for the moment the connection might be useful to them. They may make it themselves, or after a small question from you months later, or never at all, and the work can be good in any of those.

Check your own pattern too, because you have one. New to this, you'll tend to over-attribute, because the framework is salient. Experienced in it, you may expect adoption because adoption usually is operating in your caseload. Personally connected to adoption, you bring recognition other counselors would have to learn, and expectations that may not fit this client. The check is the same in all three: notice that your frame is running, then ask what the client is actually bringing.

Keep — one-page takeaway

The task is reading what the client is actually bringing, rather than defaulting to adoption attribution or adoption avoidance. Both are frames of yours; neither is the client.

Presentations where adoption may be operating unnamed

• Apologizing throughout, thanking you at the end as though granted something.
• A life organized around being useful and needed; anxiety when the doing stops.
• Leaving relationships before being left, explained as needing space or not being built for commitment.
• Waiting for the shoe to drop across close relationships, called anxiety.
• A lifelong outsider feeling with no trigger the client can name.
• Holidays that hurt for no reason the client can identify.
• "I don't know who I am," without a clear depressive picture, alongside accomplishments and people who love them.

What to do with a recognized pattern:

• Don't impose the connection. Keep working on what the client came in for and stay alert for when surfacing it would be useful to them.
• The client may connect it themselves, or after a small question months later, or never. The work can be useful in all three.
• A client with adoption history whose presentation doesn't fit these may simply be working on something else. Read what's operating.

Your own pattern (you have one)

• New to adoption work. The framework is fresh and explains a lot, so the pull is to see adoption everywhere. Ask what the actual clinical evidence is for an adoption formulation.
• Experienced in adoption work. Familiarity becomes its own blind spot. You expect adoption because it usually is operating, and a client working on something else gets read through the lens anyway.
• Personally connected to adoption. As adoptee, adoptive parent, birth parent, or close family. Recognition is a real asset, and it can import expectations that don't fit this client.

Continued considerations

• Which direction do you err in, and what evidence would change your mind about a current client?
• Think of an adopted client on your caseload. What are you attributing to adoption that you haven't tested?
• Sit with this: what would it take for you to conclude a client's problem has nothing to do with their adoption?

↓ Download this takeaway (PDF)