Overview

This territory is politically active. Adoptees, biological mothers, adoptive parents, agencies, advocates, and scholars hold a wide range of positions, including positions that critique adoption as an institution. This lesson doesn't take a position. The aim is to let you recognize the structural dimensions of what an individual client brings.

Kirsta Bowman, a domestic adoptee and reform advocate, said that growing up with pieces of paper showing how much her parents paid for her made her feel they should get a return on their investment, and that she had to prove her parents' money's worth. The documents of an adoption are also the records of a financial transaction. That's one of the structures a client may be sitting inside, and most clients never see any of them named.

Records and access rules

Original birth certificates are sealed in many US states. Sealing began in Minnesota in 1917 and spread to most states by the mid-twentieth century. The stated rationales, documented and contested in the historical and adoptee literature, included protecting biological mothers from stigma, protecting adoptive families from contact, and matching the era's belief that adoption should be a clean break. The effect was that adult adoptees in sealed-record states couldn't access their own original birth certificates, in many cases for their entire lives.

The records-reform movement has been active since the 1970s, led primarily by adoptee organizations including the American Adoption Congress, Bastard Nation, and state-level adoptee rights groups. It has produced legislative change in some states. The current landscape is variable and still changing: some states (Alaska, Kansas, Oregon, Maine, and others) have open or restored access; some have partial access requiring mutual consent or subject to a biological parent veto; some remain effectively sealed. For current status, adoptee rights organizations maintain the landscape information.

State adoption registries exist in many jurisdictions and match adoptees with biological family members when both parties register. The limitation is structural: both have to know the registry exists and take active steps, so registries produce relatively few matches relative to the number of separated parties.

DNA testing has functionally replaced the records system for many adoptees since roughly 2015. Adoptees in sealed-record states can now often identify biological relatives without ever obtaining their original birth certificate. The reform conversation continues, and the urgency around records access has shifted because the information is increasingly reachable another way.

International records vary widely. Adoptees from Korea, China, Vietnam, Russia, Romania, Guatemala, Ethiopia, and other sending countries face different rules depending on placement era and the recordkeeping of the placing country. Some have substantial paperwork. Others have minimal or falsified records.

What this looks like in a session

A clinical picture from this territory: a client of fifty-eight has known he was adopted his whole life and has spent thirty-five years trying to see his original birth certificate. His state passed a records-access bill; he applied; the document arrived. He brings it to session in a manila envelope, unfolds it, looks at it, and says he has her name now and doesn't feel anything, and he doesn't know what's wrong with him.

Nothing is wrong with him. The gap between a thirty-five year anticipation and the actual moment of holding a piece of paper can be enormous, and the response often doesn't match what anyone expected. The useful move is to make room for whatever he is or isn't feeling. Something like: what you're describing makes sense, and holding this right now doesn't have to feel like anything in particular. The document will be in his life from now on, and where the work goes next is his.

The cultural conversation

The broader conversation includes ongoing debate about same-race versus transracial placement, the economics of private adoption practice, the role of adoptive families in preparing children for the racial dimensions of their lives, and the rights of adoptees to access information about and contact with biological family. Counselors don't have to take a position. They should know the debates exist, because clients are often working through how this history shaped their own placements, and a client who has just discovered the economics of their own adoption is doing structural work, not being cynical.

Keep — one-page takeaway

Records

• OBCs sealed in many states since the early-to-mid twentieth century; sealing began in Minnesota, 1917.
• Access varies by state: open/restored (Alaska, Kansas, Oregon, Maine, others), partial or mutual-consent, or effectively sealed. Check current status via adoptee rights organizations rather than assuming.
• State registries require both parties to register, so they produce relatively few matches.
• DNA testing has functionally routed around the records system since roughly 2015.
• International records vary by country and placement era; some are minimal or falsified.

Organizations

• American Adoption Congress; Bastard Nation; state-level adoptee rights groups. They lead records reform and maintain current state-by-state information.

Economics and the cultural conversation

• The paperwork of an adoption is also the record of a transaction. Some adoptees carry a felt debt attached to a dollar figure they've seen.
• Active debates: same-race vs transracial placement, the economics of private practice, adoptee access rights. You don't need a position; you need to know clients may be working through this history.

In the room

• A response to a long-sought document may not match the anticipation. Make room for whatever is or isn't there; don't supply the feeling.
• Structural material is clinical material. A client discovering their adoption's economics isn't being cynical.
• You don't have to become a legal resource. Know enough to recognize what the client is up against, and point them to the organizations that track it.

Continued considerations

• Do you know what your own state does with original birth certificates?
• What's your reaction to an adoptee who is angry at the institution of adoption, and what does that reaction tell you?
• Sit with this: what does it do to a person to need permission to know their own name?

↓ Download this takeaway (PDF)